- CRANE SONG PHOENIX VST MANUAL
- CRANE SONG PHOENIX VST PRO
- CRANE SONG PHOENIX VST PSP
- CRANE SONG PHOENIX VST FREE
What could have caused the problem in the other session I do not know. Today I tried on another session and here everything went well! I was able to instanciate no less that seven phoenix plugins of varied types and they happily lived on one and the same dsp chip. With the session I worked on yesterday this simply did not go as it should have. It will run approx 20 instances of a plug-in on a single dsp chip (HD at 44.1)".
CRANE SONG PHOENIX VST MANUAL
What is said in the manual is: "Running with digidesign's architecture Phoenix is very dsp efficient. If that is the case it should be clearly stated. However the information about phoenix does not say that the 5 different types of the plugin can not live together on one and the same A-type dsp chip as you seem to imply in your e-mail.
I mention A, B and C type chips and indeed phoenix requires what I called A-type chips. I am aware of the differences in dsp chips on mix cards as you can clearly read from my post. The plugin tells the dsp manger what its requirementsĪnd Phoenix was running in beta on mix for 1 year before its releaseīTW, Dave also mentioned that he has not recieved 5 emails from anyone concerning this.ġ. Order of loading the plugin can make a difference with what the dsp Manager will put it in the next available chip. The required memory is not available on one dsp chip the digi dsp When using the different versions at the same time, if Problem with HD where all 9 chips have external static memory.ĭifferent versions of the plugin's 5 types have different memory Limits the number of chips that it will run on to 2 of the 6. In order for Phoenix to work at all it requires static There are 3 types of dsp in mix hardware.Ģ chips have no external memory two have dynamic ram and two PS I've sent about 5 e-mails to cranesong with various questions and remarks. When the session loads I then manually assign the easy plugins to type B or C dsp chips. That way when PT starts up it will not, what in its infinite wisdom it always does, start filling up the premium dsp chips with plugins which can just as well live happily on any other type of dsp chip. First year computer science students get to make allocation programs as exercices!!Īctually because of this, with a heavy session where dsp is almost maxed out, I will sometimes save the session with all easy (meaning they can live on any type of chip) plugins made inactive. How it is possible for such a beautiful program like PT to have such a piece of crap-programming embedded in it is beyond me. In almost all these instances I am able to manually reshuffle some plugins to instanciate all I want.
CRANE SONG PHOENIX VST FREE
I'd like to meet the guy who programmed this!! It happens regularly that PT says :" error bla bla, no free dsp found, unable to instanciate, etc.". That is costly, certainly because it only sits on the A-type chips which are the ones most in demand by other important plugins too.Īnd about the PT reshuffling. Now if you want to use this plugin on several tracks rather than on the mixbus, and it needs a new dsp chip every two or three instanciations then obviously you will be using say 3 dsp chips instead of just one. In the announcment of cranesong it clearly says that the plugin is very dsp friendly and from the figure (20 plugins on 1 dsp chip) they give for an HD card I would expect about 8 plugins to be able to sit on 1 dsp in a MIX system.
CRANE SONG PHOENIX VST PRO
And you hit the nail on the head when you said: "Are you concerned that you might need the entirety of one chip for another plugin? When faced with that, will Pro Tools reshuffle things?" why do plug-in companies do stuff like that ?
CRANE SONG PHOENIX VST PSP
i have not tried the psp warmer which people here seem to like - and i won't because its not possible to put it across an aux fader - therefore rendering it useless to me. i just wish that the phoenix had a way to level match the output because if you crank it it does bring the gain up quite a bit. personally even if it was better, im all in the box by choice as i want to simplify my life so i wouldn't by a hedd even if it was a religious experience. i don't know how the phoenix compares to the hedd however - it would be interesting to see what hedd people have to say. i do still like duy tape though on the drum submix because it messes it up so much more - but maybe i'll gang up the phoenix instead. its also the only tape sim plug-in that you can add after the mix is complete and it won't mess up the balances - where as duy tape is something i always had to mix with from the beginning due to its changing stuff so much. its unreal for its tape saturation characteristics, but bore than that is the 3d dimensionality it creates.
0 kommentar(er)
